The state of Kentucky has recently passed a new gambling law that is set to face an inevitable legal challenge. The law, which was passed in April 2021, allows for the legalization of historical horse racing machines (HHRs). These machines are electronic gambling devices that allow players to bet on past horse races.

The new law was passed as a way to generate revenue for the state, with estimates suggesting that it could bring in up to $50 million in annual tax revenue. However, opponents of the law argue that it is unconstitutional and violates the state’s gambling laws.

The main argument against the new law is that HHRs are not actually historical racing, but rather slot machines that are disguised as such. This argument is based on the fact that HHRs use a random number generator to determine the outcome of each race, rather than using the results of past races.

Opponents of the law also argue that it violates the state’s constitution, which prohibits gambling except for a few specific exceptions. They argue that HHRs do not fall under any of these exceptions and therefore should not be legalized.

The legal challenge to the new law is expected to come from the Family Foundation, a conservative advocacy group that has been a vocal opponent of gambling in Kentucky. The group has already filed a lawsuit against the state over a previous attempt to legalize HHRs, which was struck down by the state Supreme Court in 2018.

If the new law is struck down by the courts, it could have significant implications for the future of gambling in Kentucky. The state has long been a hotbed of horse racing, with the Kentucky Derby being one of the most famous horse races in the world. However, the state has been slow to embrace other forms of gambling, with casino gambling still illegal.

Proponents of the new law argue that it will help to boost the state’s economy and create jobs. They also point out that other states, such as neighboring Indiana, have already legalized HHRs without any legal challenges.

The legal challenge to the new law is likely to be a long and drawn-out process, with both sides expected to present extensive arguments in court. Ultimately, it will be up to the courts to decide whether or not the new law is constitutional and whether or not HHRs should be legalized in Kentucky.